Comments on: What About Children Without Hands? http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/ Daryl's Personal Blog Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:51:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: phillips http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-828 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-828 looking for information and found it at this great site.

]]> By: Cellular ringtones http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-826 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-826 Cellular ringtones…

Hello! Great site! Cellular ringtones…

]]> By: fuck dog http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-827 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-827 suck horse dick…

zoo pics,
zoo sex,
zoo movies,
fuck horse,
sex with dog,
sex with animal….

]]> By: Carla http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-824 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-824 OK, I’m probably one of the people that you think would be offended by this entry. Can’t say I’m offended (or surprised) though you know I disagree with you. In a big way. I do agree that they guy who wrote the letter to the paper wasn’t very Christ-like. Calling people stupid is not a good way to get your point across.

]]> By: José Ramírez http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-825 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-825 Well said.

I imagine that the original writer would say “Well, watermelons aren’t meant to be eaten nor animals that run faster than humans. They taste good, but it’s Satan’s way to make you an unbeliever. Only fuits, vegetables, animals that can be grabbed with one hand are meant to be eaten.”

LOL, apologetics crack me up.

I still don’t know if you’re an atheist or agnostic or whatever, but I’m glad you’re on my side on the topic of evolution.

Cheers.

]]> By: Richie http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-823 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-823 I don’t know if its me or the computer I’m on, but half the comments I try to make give me
a validaiton error.

]]> By: Daryl http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-822 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-822 I don’t have a problem in the world with people who are inclined to take solace in religion. Certainly there are some comforts to be had there, and there are social benefits, especially for children, in going to church. But when stupidity and inconsistency of this magnitute rear their heads, it’s hard to keep quiet about it.

]]> By: Richie http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-820 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-820 You know here lately I’ve been wafering on my beleifs. It use to be nice to just dismiss
religion and its principles, but I’ve been thinking what if. Not that I’m turning to a
bible carrier or anything. It would be nice to think we aren’t merely limited to this
short life here. Maybe I just need a refresher of E-house religion 101. Sorry to fill
up your blog with my ramblings.

]]> By: Kim http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands/#comment-821 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://daryl.wordpress.com/2005/02/18/what-about-children-without-hands#comment-821 You know, I was thinking of a watermelon, as well, as soon as I read the bit from the original letter. Anyways, I hope the newspaper does print your reply. :)

]]>