I’m moving my Flock entries to another blog for two reasons. One is that most of the people who care enough about me to read this blog don’t really care about all the things I’m going to be writing about Flock in the future. Or to be more precise, they’re interested in Flock in the passing way that one is interested in what an acquaintance or loved-one is doing to earn his living, but they don’t really want — and I can’t blame them — to see three blog posts a day about what’s going on in the Flock community. And as I’ve just switched roles at Flock, leading our community initiative and leaving browser development more or less behind (I hope, as this sort of development was never especially fun for me), there will be a lot more of those posts. The other reason I’m moving those to another blog is that people in the Flock community don’t necessarily want to read about my weight loss (when I last weighed in, I was down 33 pounds from when I started) or my baby. So writing in two places makes pretty good sense. And that’s that.
Monthly Archives: October 2005
Wanna Help?
As noted previously, I’ve been overwhelmed by the positive response Flock has gotten so far. The community forums have been hopping (I’m trying to put a little dent in responding to a backlog each day; if there’s something pressing in there that nobody’s responded to yet, drop me an email at daryl at flock.com and I’ll see if I can help), and we’ve had a good bit of activity on our Flockstars list. We’ve also had an overwhelming number of offers of help. Believe it or not, it can be very hard to accept help because all the offers have to be organized, but don’t worry — we intend to organize all the offers and accept a lot of the help.
For the time being, if you’d like to volunteer to help out in some way, you can go here to do so. We might not get back to you right away, but by submitting your info here, you guarantee that it gets stored in a searchable database rather than lost in somebody’s inbox or blog comments.
If you’re one of the few dozen people who commented on Geoffrey’s blog post, I’ve probably sent you an email asking you to do the unspeakable and resubmit your info using the new page. I hate to ask you to do this, but it saves me a lot of time that I can put to better use actually working on Flock, and I figure you guys’re all behind that and will forgive my asking you to do something sort of redundant. If you’ve offered through some other means, I hope you’ll also do me the favor of filling out the new form with your info, just to make sure we’ve captured your offer. Thanks!
Flock Launches!
On Monday, I had my gall bladder removed. Yesterday, I worked a 15-hour day because we decided to launch Flock publicly. Today, I’ll be good for more or less nothing.
We’ve been releasing to larger and larger beta groups over the last week or so, and we decided yesterday afternoon to go ahead and release publicly. Of course, we had much work do to, as we had been focusing more on shipping a browser than on getting our public Web site in good shape, etc., and so our crew spent the evening whipping that stuff into good — not great, but good enough — order for public consumption. This meant crossing our fingers that we could withstand a slashdotting better than we did two weeks ago (because of some heavy-duty server infrastructure changes we made, we weathered it without issue). This meant working on our messaging a bit in order to help preempt some of the stupid sorts of comments that always seem to emerge. When we half-released for Web 2.0 a couple of weeks ago, for example, rumors abounded that we were taking Firefox, making it Windows-only, and slipping in adware. WTF? So we obviously wanted to have some blog posts and FAQs in place to explain some of what we’re doing. What we’ve got so far is available at www.flock.com.
The slashdot reviews have been much more even-handed this time. There have been the expected trolls (and let me just say that even though the trolls shouldn’t bother me, they do, because after all, I’ve missed bits of my daughter’s childhood to write the software they’re panning, and I’ve sat up with a hurting abdomen the day after surgery to do things to get a pre-release out; the whole crew has made big sacrifices to ship the software these trolls dismiss out of hand without regard for the human effort that drives its production; one would hope they’d at least download the software and try it out before dismissing it, but it seems that few do). But there have been some really good comments as well. Among my favorites:
Giving me quick access to something like a blog or Flickr isn’t “innovative”. A bookmark/favorite does the same thing with less overhead.
I thought the same thing until I actually tried the Flock Developer Preview that was just released. (I’m posting this from it now.)
I was all set to be unimpressed but I have to tell you, it’s pretty impressive if you have a blog how easy they have made posting Web content to it. There’s a “shelf” tool, for starters, that you use by just highlighting any text on a page and dragging-and-dropping it into the Shelf. Then, when you want to post about that text, you just click the “Blog this” button on the toolbar; this opens a new post (Flock autodetects the settings for your blog, so there’s no configuration if you use most popular packages) in a WYSIWYG editor. Drag the text from the shelf into the editor and it pops the text in, encloses it in BLOCKQUOTE tags, and adds the cite=”" attribute with the URL from the original page.
Revolutionary? Maybe not. But it’s so damn slick! Currently when I blog something I copy it from Firefox into an HTML editor (Movable Type’s built in editor sucks), mark it up there, log into the admin screen for my blog, then paste the marked-up text into a new post. Oh, and then I have to go back and find the original URL, copy it, and paste it in the appropriate pages. That’s a lot of back and forth that Flock eliminates.
Some people use a tool like MarsEdit [ranchero.com] or wBloggar [wbloggar.com] to combine the “markup” and “posting” steps together in one place. But Flock puts all the features of those products right in my browser — no switching between programs, no copy/paste gymnastics. There’s a market for those products, so it’s not a big leap to imagine a market for Flock, either (albeit a small one).
It’ll be interesting to see how well Flock holds up to ongoing use over time. But my first impressions are better than I expected them to be. You might want to try it too before you pass judgement…
Slashdot | Firefox-based Social Browser Flock Launches
and
Flock had me skeptical from the screenshots (ugly and useless), but having actually used it, it’s pretty gosh darn neat. The Shelf is an incredible killer feature. I’ve tried out a few similar extensions for Firefox, but none did it as smoothly and intuitively as Flock has. All it needs is a few hardcore snippet-management-tools, and it’ll be my new favorite research program.
Likewise, the blog editor falls under the “pretty neat” status. The formatting gets eaten by WordPress.com’s post-parser (to filter out nasty javascript and other malicious evil), but that isn’t a major downer, as it does tend to exhibit some weirdness like underline remaining after deleting a link. The WYSIWYG-editor part of it definately needs some work to be up to par with the rest of the browser.
Overall, I’ve been seriously impressed. For being a the first public release of a browser, it’s feature-filled and non-crashy. This must be attributed to it being based on Firefox. All it needs is a few months of polish and I can unconditionally accept it as my new primary browser. As is, I’m giving the idea serious thought.
P.S.: I didn’t use the del.icio.us integration, as I didn’t really use the service much before. But now that it’s seamlessly integrated into the browser, I’ll try it out again.
Slashdot | Firefox-based Social Browser Flock Launches
Of course, these appeal to me in part because I’m the perpetrator of the shelf (with its various warts and pimples), which gets pretty good reviews so far. But they also give me a little hope for the slashdot crowd. There actually are those who expect one thing, evaluate the software, and come away with a more balanced view rather than falling back on the old standby comments about how silly social networking is or how we must be making Firefox into a Windows-only spyware engine.
It’s been a good morning. I’ve been reading and responding to mail from our flockstars mailing list, where people are already submitting extensions that will work in Flock, and glancing over the hundreds of feedback emails that have come in over the last 12 hours. Response overall has been very good. Yes, we have a long way to go, and there are many crucial bugs we have yet to fix, but the people we’re aiming at seem to think we’re on to something, and that’s nice validation.
I plan to work until noon today and then to take most of the rest of the day off to try to spend with my daughter, whom I don’t think I even hugged or kissed once yesterday. Then there’ll probably be a regrouping/evaluation conference call this evening where the Flock crew will talk about the last day and the coming very busy days, deciding just how we’re going to keep up our momentum and try to deliver a better and better and better product. Stay tuned!
man flock
My favorite comment when Flock got slashdotted last week was someone’s pasting in the man page for the unix system call “flock.”
Most of the other comments I read were kind of hurtful or misinformed, and you can read a couple of Flockers’ responses here, here, and here.
Andy Smith puts it pretty well:
Recap: Vim good. Java bad. Windows Bad. Flock good.
Flock Radio – The latest fresh-squeezed feeds from the folks bringin’ you Flock.
Flock really does sort of seem to be getting closer and closer to good. I’ve used it to assemble this blog post, and I’m getting more and more excited about being able to manage my most frequently-visited or need-to-be-able-to-find-later places on the web. The browser’s to the point, I think, at which I can switch to having it be my primary browser. It’s still very much an alpha-beta product, but so was Firefox when I started using it, and we’ll be working in the coming weeks to sanding off a lot of the rough edges (or should I say unruffling some of the ruffled feathers?). We release to the public very soon, and I’m both excited and apprehensive
This is what I do
People I know seem not really to know what I do for a living. They know it has to do with computers, and most of them know I’m working on
software, and many know that I’m doing something with browser software. In a nutshell, here’s what my company does:
Flock hopes to turn the browser into a dashboard for collaborating, blogging, sharing photos, reveling in a raft of other group activities that have recently caught fire online (see BW, 9/26/05, “It’s a Whole New Web”).
Flock, the New Browser on the Block
So far, based on my dogfeeding our software last night and this morning, we’re well on the way to success. I’m blogging manically lately, I guess. What we’re doing is exciting, and it’s good to have something techy to blog about, plus it’s cool to use the tool I’ve helped create to blog about said tool. My apologies (to both of my readers) for all the redundancy lately.
6:00 a.m.
So, here it is, 6:00 in the morning, and I’m just getting off work for the day. Web 2.0 starts today, and as the social browser company, we were naturally eager to demo our software at this important conference. The whole team is together in Palo Alto for the first time this week –
Lloyd D Budd in from Canada, Robin * Slomkowski in from Germany, and of course little bumpkin me in from Tennessee. It’s so far been a week of late nights, sometimes very productive and sometimes very frustrating, but so far, it feels like it’s paid off. We have kind of a kick-ass (if still pretty darned buggy) browser that I finally feel like I can just about use on a day-to-day basis. It’s helping me to collect links for this post and in fact to actually write the post, and that’s a very cool thing. As noted previously, I’m not really in a position to talk about specific features just yet, but I can say that what we’ve done is very cool. There are some big new things and then there are a number of smaller things that just make the browser less cumbersome to use. Plus it looks really snazzy.
That’s me in the picture, tag-teaming some nasty theme stuff with Manish Singh. We work out of a messy garage office piled high with beer and energy drink cans. Geoffrey brings his pooch, Stella, in on most days, and it turns out she can be pretty therapeutic. I spent about twenty hours in the office yesterday, and I’m not even one of the guys who sprawls out on the floor to catch a few winks between marathon coding sessions. It’s been a hard week but so far a mostly rewarding one and often a fun one. Here’s hoping those in attendance at Web 2.0 will think our product worth a second look once we’re in a position to release in the fairly near term.
It’s 6:00 a.m. and I’m too wired to sleep. I’m playing with our product, and I think I’m going to work on some side projects now and maybe sneak in some reading. Then it’s back into the office in another four or five hours to tie up loose ends with the demo and to work on a release plan for the coming days and weeks.
Flock Tease
I’ve been in Palo Alto since Thursday night and will be here until Friday night, when I take an overnight flight home. We’ve been burning candles at all ends to try to get a release ready in time for a demo on Wednesday. Progress has been spotty. I’ve been working on various cosmetic features. For example, I’ve been up to my elbows in wacky CSS issues in order to change the style of — oh yeah, I can’t talk about that feature. Ok, so then I’ve furrowed my brow many many times while trying to figure out — oh yeah, can’t talk about that one either. Stay tuned, though. We hope to be releasing before too much longer, and it’s getting pretty exciting.