<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Abortion Manual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2006/02/27/an-abortion-manual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2006/02/27/an-abortion-manual/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Two Ells &#187; SJR127: Eroding Tennesseans&#8217; Privacy</title>
		<link>http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2006/02/27/an-abortion-manual/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Ells &#187; SJR127: Eroding Tennesseans&#8217; Privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1673</guid>
		<description> [...] The speakeasy-type abortion clinic I&#8217;ve previously blogged about as a harrowing possible scenario in South Dakota shouldn&#8217;t scare only South Dakotans. As progressive and rational as the citizens of Tennessee are renowned for being (ahem, Scopes trial), our government is also seeking to pass legislation that would erode women&#8217;s privacy and quite probably force some women into such dire straits. The offending bill is SJR127, and, procedural &#8220;WHEREAS&#8221; type stuff aside, it reads as follows: &#8220;Nothing in this constitution secures or protects the right to an abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The speakeasy-type abortion clinic I&#8217;ve previously blogged about as a harrowing possible scenario in South Dakota shouldn&#8217;t scare only South Dakotans. As progressive and rational as the citizens of Tennessee are renowned for being (ahem, Scopes trial), our government is also seeking to pass legislation that would erode women&#8217;s privacy and quite probably force some women into such dire straits. The offending bill is SJR127, and, procedural &#8220;WHEREAS&#8221; type stuff aside, it reads as follows: &#8220;Nothing in this constitution secures or protects the right to an abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The soft bits under my plastron</title>
		<link>http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2006/02/27/an-abortion-manual/#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>The soft bits under my plastron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1674</guid>
		<description> &lt;strong&gt;A Womanâ€™s Deadly Garden: Desperate Measures...&lt;/strong&gt;

All I do anymore is political writing, it seems. Here's something I wrote and tossed up on dKos tonight. But before that, a couple of personal notes. Kate's a sickling today, poor thing, big fever all day and throwing up......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Womanâ€™s Deadly Garden: Desperate Measures&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>All I do anymore is political writing, it seems. Here&#8217;s something I wrote and tossed up on dKos tonight. But before that, a couple of personal notes. Kate&#8217;s a sickling today, poor thing, big fever all day and throwing up&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexB</title>
		<link>http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2006/02/27/an-abortion-manual/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1684</guid>
		<description> In Ireland these people were called Angelmakers, I believe. There's a uk film out that describes the life of one such woman...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Ireland these people were called Angelmakers, I believe. There&#8217;s a uk film out that describes the life of one such woman&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
