Archive for the ‘On_the_web’ Category

A remedy for GooTube. Also cures gout, improves temperament, and de-angrifies the blood.

October 11th, 2006 by daryl

There’s been much ado of late about Google’s acquisition of YouTube. Many are referring to YouTube now as GooTube, and it’s clear from some videos on YouTube that some folk are pretty nervous about the acquisition, fearing that the video service will become a pay-to-play service or that Google will find some other way to ruin YouTube. My own attention lately has been directed largely to the preparation of my home for sale, and as part of those preparations, I’ve purchased a product, pictured here, that may be of interest to those worried by this new business partnership. I present to you “Goo Gone,” which in my experience is better at killing ants than it is at anything else. Apply to GooTube and rub vigorously. Results may vary.

Molly Ivins on educational demonstration devices

October 3rd, 2006 by daryl

I found this linked on a site I read pretty regularly that deals in feminism. It’s got a lot of dildoes (er, educational demonstration devices, I mean) in it and at least one swear word in a joke Molly Ivins tells at the end of the clip, so you might want to steer clear if either of those is likely to bother you. The movie highlights the absurdity of laws that seek to legislate what consenting adults can do alone or together in their boudoirs.

 

KnoxBloggers

September 13th, 2006 by daryl

I waited a few days to blog this because Perry and Mike blogged it near-simultaneously, and I wanted to have a little space between all the KnoxBloggers posts on the KnoxBloggers web site. Huh?

So, KnoxBloggers.com is a little site Mike and Perry and I set up to support the blogging tools meetup group we’re sort of the ring leaders of. The front page aggregates blog posts of designated users (hence my wanting time between posts about the site itself; else there’d've been three posts in a row saying more or less the same thing). There’s also an about page where area bloggers can scrape source code for a button to promote the site. Then there are tools and services pages, where we’ll list and point to posts/discussion about the topics we discuss at our meetings. And you can find information about upcoming meetups at the site as well.

If you’re interested in tools used for blogging and are in the Knoxville area, check it out, maybe sign up at the site, attend our second meeting next week (topic podcasting), and maybe you’ll get your site’s content aggregated on the site eventually. For whatever that’s worth.

Comments

September 3rd, 2006 by daryl

Before we dive in here, take a look at the screenshot. 2,398 spam comments caught since I last checked a couple of weeks ago. 19,135 since I upgraded my wordpress version a few months ago. That’s plenty more spam than most of my three millions of readers could even imagine getting. In the interest of complete honesty, I’ll confess that I don’t see all of those spam comments. Wordpress’s Akisment plugin is great about catching a lot of them. But from time to time, it gets to where I see “please moderate me” messages from 5 or 10 spam comments every couple of days from assholes peddling Hoodia or V1agakra or whatever, and that’s more than it’s really worth to me to get the occasional “so tell me again how you do this in Drupal?” question or the odd quip from a friend. So, as you read, consider that, besides the occasional infuriating blog comment spam, I get probably a couple hundred other email spams a day, and if you have a problem with my attitude toward blog comments, I invite you to get bent.

A couple of people have given me crap about turning comments off. My general philosophy is as follows: If you know me and want to comment on something I’ve said and your comment is worth any effort at all, you probably know my email address and will just email me. If it’s not worth the extra two seconds it takes to start an email message, it’s probably not worth my time to read it. Sorry, just being honest. Really, I’m giving you credit here. I know you’re possessed of the faculties to make humorous quick one-off comments on my blog, and for the past few weeks, I’ve been saving you the effort of typing them in. You can thank me by buying me something off my Amazon list.

Given the complaints (who knew I wrote anything so compelling?), I’m turning comments back on for future posts. As most of my comment spam comes from long-uncompelling posts, perhaps I’ll just go through every once in a while and disable comments on individual posts older than a given age. Anyway, for the time being, I’m allowing comments again. Enlighten me, dear three millions of readers.

Late-night confessions

September 1st, 2006 by daryl

From a late-night IRC conversation with a Flock staffer and a Flock community member. It’s sort of a running joke that, a Southerner, I partake of all the bad habits and am characterized by all the provincialisms generally associated with the South.

daryl: (sorry, it’s late here and I’m working on a blog post entitled “My complex relationship with meat,” so it’s fitting that I should be in a weird mindframe ;)
yosh
: mmmmmmmeat
daryl
: yosh, I’m occasionally eating meat again
daryl
: we ran out of vegetables in Tennessee
daryl
: except for tobacco, that is, and it tastes really bad
yosh
: well, TN really didn’t have that many
yosh: daryl: tobacco can be good with the right sauce
daryl
: like a durian sauce?
yosh: durian-natto sauce
daryl: heh
daryl
: actually, I’m mainly eating meat b/c my newly pregnant wife craves it and I’m tired of cooking two meals a night
yosh
: heh
[redacted]: daryl: you actually eat tabacco?
daryl
: [redacted], it’s a staple in Tennessee
daryl
: that and buggering cows ;)
daryl: (no, I don’t eat tobacco)
daryl
: (though I am married to my sister, who is also my grandmother and my third cousin six times removed; and my father)
yosh
: daryl is his own grandpa
daryl: and grandma
daryl: I’m also my own sandwich
daryl
: (my other grandpa having mated with a tobacco plant, that is)
[redacted]: daryl: good (you don’t eat tobacco) ;-)
daryl: opium, now that’s a different story ;)

Knoxville Blogger’s Meetup Post Mortem

August 23rd, 2006 by daryl

Tonight, I attended the blogger meetup that Mike organized. Counting Mike’s brother and girlfriend (both of whom were mostly absent but were warm bodies in occasional attendance, so I’ll count them provisionally), there were eight of us, all tied to Mike through past or current jobs or the aforementioned relationships. One guy was an apparently random acquaintance of Mike’s who since connecting with him has gotten a job at Mike’s place of work through no help from Mike (more or less at random, that is). Weird. Anyway, so we had a pretty decent crowd for a first meetup, though I hope that for future meetings, we can expand our network a bit and bring in some new folk. (Which let me say is a strange thing for me to hope because I’m generally pretty reclusive and not interested in adding more people to the list of those I feel obligated to remember or communicate with. Let’s keep that our little secret.)

We had discussion of three items on the agenda: photo manipulation/hosting tools, Flock as the blogger’s browser, and video blogging.

First, Mike gave an overview of Google’s Picassa, which includes a desktop client for photo manipulation and a (beta) web service for display of photos in albums. The client looks pretty nice, with basic and pretty easy-to-use tools for manipulating photos. Want to bring out highlights in a picture? Just hit the highlights button and adjust the levels (or something like that). It seems like a great lightweight tool for doing the sort of basic operations that those of us who’re intimidated by Photosho or The Gimp are likely to want to do. As for uploading and displaying, there are some weak points. You can’t upload one-off photos, for example — they all have to go into an album. For most users, this is probably fine, but it’s nice to be able to post a one-off screen shot as well. The web display itself seems pretty weak. There’s a concept of favorites or friends, and there are settings to be able to publicly list albums, but there seems to be no interface for searching for photos or friends. If I happen to know Mike’s gmail username and know the base url for the photo service, I can assemble a url that will show me his albums, but that’s not user-friendly to say the least. I imagine the service will be expanded to fix these problems. All of this is basically moot for me, as the client isn’t available for linux, but it was interesting nevertheless.

Next, Mike gave a demonstration of Flickr’s capabilities. I hadn’t expected to learn much here, but he showed me some things I hadn’t looked into before, most of the details of which I’ve forgotten by now but will delve back into as need arises. There’s more you can do with Flickr’s organizer tool than I had ever discovered; I had always thought of it as merely a way to organize sets, but you can batch add tags, set privacy, etc., and with some of the gaps in Flock’s ability to batch edit photos, these things are very useful. There are also some neat views of photos and tags that I hadn’t looked into. My impression of Flickr in recent months has been a better one than previously. Things seem more discoverable since some features were added to the site. Between that and Mike’s demo, I may find myself actually using the site more than I’ve been accustomed to doing in the past.

At this point in the evening, after a late start, we’re more than an hour into the evening and it’s my turn to present. Mid-presentation (baby’s bed-time), I get a call from my wife that I dismiss. The moral of the story is that we need to plan less stuff for these meetings and trust the power of gab to carry us through to a sufficiently lengthy time. I thought at this point about suggesting that we push either Perry’s vlogging segment or my segment off to a future session, but I wimped out, not wanting to hijack the meeting.

As I result, I rushed through my segment, for which I’m a little embarrassed to admit I wasn’t terribly well prepared. It was clear that Mike had spent some time thinking about what he was going to demo. I had run through doing a blog post in Flock’s editor but hadn’t really scripted anything out, and I think that between that and my being in a rush, I probably did a pretty poor job of showcasing Flock’s capabilities. We’ll be releasing a new version of the software before too long, and there’ll be big changes then, so perhaps I can get some more time then and do a better job. The 30-second version of my presentation is roughly as follows: Hey, there’s an html rich editor, so you don’t have to code html anymore. There’s also this little shelf thing at the bottom that you can drag pictures and text into and then back out of to construct rich blog posts. And there’s this photobar that shows your Flickr photos (and those of others) for easy dragging into blog posts. And you can easily drag/drop upload photos straight from within your browser and get notifications when your friends post their photos. (Not covered in my presentation but important is the fact that this uploader tool works in linux and thus has caused me to upgrade to a pro Flickr account and actually bother to snap photos.)

Now Perry stepped up to the plate to talk about screencasting. A screencast is basically a movie of somebody’s desktop as they use software and explain the process. He reviewed several tools that I was interested in seeing but that were sort of dead ends for me because they can’t be used on linux. (Side note: A week or two ago, I briefly evaluated something called xvidcap for linux; after hacking the config so that it would compile on my system, I wound up finding the software difficult to use, but probably about as good as it gets for this type of software on linux.) In one case, Perry used a piece of screencasting software to do a screencast of the software itself. (It was during this window that my future self came back to visit me and prevented my future untimely demise by suggesting that I take an alternate route home; it was strange.) I found myself thinking during Perry’s presentation that the perfect synthesis of our evening would be Perry’s doing a screencast of Picassa and posting it to his blog using Flock. (My future self had nothing to say about whether this would actually happen, though I did press for an answer.) (Ahem. It’s late and I’m tired.)

After Perry’s talk, we briefly discussed finding a mechanism for publishing events. Orkut (which several of us had signed up for) sucks for this sort of thing, and who wants to pay meetup.com for this? We discussed using Gmail’s calendar, which we should be able to syndicate for publication on a web site if we ever build one. We also discussed finding a plugin for Wordpress and just having a blog site. I think we finally concluded to not worry too much about web infrastructure until the core group’s a little more established and we have any hope of attracting a broader audience.

And so concluded our meetup. I think Mike briefly proposed discussing next time (probably a month or so from now) some of the options for hosting your blog. All in all, it was a good meeting, and I’m frankly a little surprised to report (see note above about my being nearly pathologically anti-social) that I look forward to the next one.

Flickr

August 11th, 2006 by daryl

Flickr is a photo sharing service that’s taken off in the last couple of years. It allows for tagging (read: labeling) of photos, incorporation of photos into sets, sharing with groups, featuring them easily on your web site, blogging them easily, and plenty more. In the last year or so, they’ve added printing services a la kodakgallery. And it’s free (though there is a paid version that gives you more bandwidth and ad-free browsing). The only downside I can really see to it after a recent redesign that made the site easier to use is that it doesn’t seem to have a way to share private photos with people who aren’t members of Flickr. Kodakgallery lets you send email to people that lets them see your private photos without being members.

My company makes a browser that has a nice Flickr uploader tool built in. This is great for me as a Linux user because none of the other tools that make Flickr or Kodakgallery manageable for Windows and Mac users work for Linux. So to use the services without Flock, I have to manually browse to and blindly upload each photo in an ugly form and then go in and apply tags, descriptions, privacy, etc. Flock lets me browse, resize, crop, tag, describe, set privacy options, and add photos to a set in a nice little window devised for the purpose. It’s great.

Because we’re tied in pretty heavily with photo sharing services, my company got nice (compact 7.x megapixel Canon PowerShot) cameras for all staff members. Mleeka and I already had a pretty nice Canon PowerShot that she, as family photographer, maintained control over. Which meant that when I went out to CA or even just out and about, I never had a camera. Which was ok because I’m not a good photographer and don’t have any sort of passion for it. But now that we have two cameras, I get the original one and she gets the newer one and I snap photos of random things now. Take for example the cans pictured here.

I upload them to Flickr using Flock, but I mark most of them private and viewable only by friends and family because most of the shots I take are of Lennie, and I don’t want just anybody having pictures of my often half-naked (diapered) daughter. There are some real weirdos out there. So, basically, if you’re somebody I know personally (don’t bother otherwise) and don’t have a Flickr account but want to see pictures of Lennie when I upload them (every two or three days of late), get an account and ask me to add you as a friend.

If you happen also to download Flock, you can add me as a contact there and be notified automatically when I upload new photos. As in a little button changes colors to let you know that there’s new stuff. When you press the button, you get a little slideshow-type view of my pictures. Nifty, huh?

Would you like to make your life on the web easier?

May 15th, 2006 by daryl

So, let’s just pretend for a moment that there was a link you wanted to send to someone that had an insufferably long URL. So you try to paste it into your email program, but the person you were trying to send it to couldn’t view it because their stupid email program cut the link off. And what ensues is a ridiculous six-email-long conversation in which you say things like “no, backspace but then add a percent sign, and then copy — yeah, control C — and then paste — I think it’s control P — oh, crap, you did a backspace?” And so imagine that you could just say “go to http://shrtlnk.com/daryl/beach” to show off your beach photos otherwise available at an oppresively long url. Would that be useful?

There’s at least one site that provides a similar service (tinyurl.com). Unfortunately, it shackles you to its random url scheme. That is, instead of the short and semantically useful http://shrtlnk.com/daryl/beach or (if you’re logged in) http://shrtlnk.com/beach), it might force you to use something like http://tinyurl.com/g8lrz. But something like http://shrtlnk.com/daryl/beach might be more useful to you and your friends. And something like http://shrtlnk.com/daryl might be a useful as a way of organizing the things that your friend daryl is linking to. Is this something you might find useful?

If you were a Firefox or a Flock user and it were easy for you to click a button, apply a label, and passively share a long-url’d link with a friend, would you do it?

Podcasting

January 22nd, 2006 by daryl

I did my first podcast this week. It took me hours to produce a 13-minute piece. A lot of the time was researching and selecting creative commons-licensed music for bumpers between segments, and a substantial part of it was finding and learning to use some audio-editing software (Apple’s Garage Band sucks for this, but there’s an open source program called audacity that’s pretty easy to use and does exactly what I need it to do. Still, to compile it and all its dependencies on my laptop today took an hour or two. Anyway, the podcast can be found here with all its warts and boils. It’s a dull work podcast, so don’t get too excited unless you’re interested in what I’m doing for work. Getting up to speed on all of this was rough, but from here on out, I think it’ll be easier, and it’s a somewhat more lively medium for delivering content than blogging is. While I think I can communicate more clearly and eloquently in written words the things I want to say, it takes me a while and loses some of the tonal nuance I hear in my head as I write things. And if you don’t overproduce it, I think podcasts stand to be a quicker way of generating off-the-cuff content, if a less polished way for microphonophobes like me. I’m thinking very hard about supplementing portions of this blog with podcasts. It’ll be easier for me to record a quick 30-second blurb about Lennie than to sit down and dread having to stitch together a month’s worth of updates. I’ll feel less self-conscious about producing a mediocre podcast than writing a mediocre post, perhaps because the podcast is more transitory and less open to scrutiny. My ever-discriminating audience is more likely to forgive a vocal blunder than a written one. There are some things I’ve written in particular that I’d like to capture vocally, as they’re definitely more alive in my head than they are on the computer screen.

Loyal Opposition

December 21st, 2005 by daryl

A discussion mailing list I belong to has flared up this week over US politics having to do with Iraq. Liberals continue to cry out indignantly about the injustice of the war; conservatives continue to suggest that the war was justified and that liberals are appealing to emotions rather than to facts for their positions. I stay out of the discussion for the most part because I think being informed enough about the matter from unbiased sources is pretty much impossible for average Joes, so my input is only so valuable. But when somebody posted the following message, I had to respond.

There was a vote in the House on Friday. The vote was on H Res 612 “Expressing the commitment of the House of Representatives to achieving victory in Iraq.” Believe it or not, 108 Democrats voted no. Think about it, 108 Democrats are now on record as opposing victory in Iraq. There’s your “loyal” opposition…

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll648.xml

And here’s how I responded:

Try reading the resolution. The summary you provide is one of eight major points, several of which I can see people not being comfortable voting for. You can read the full text at http://thomas.loc.gov (it’s a short resolution and an easy read). [Note that I actually pasted in a URL that didn't work b/c of the way the site handles search queries; to get the actual bill, go to the url linked and do a search on "HR Res 612".] Problem clauses to my mind include at least the following:

  • setting an artificial timetable for the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Iraq, or immediately terminating their deployment in Iraq and redeploying them elsewhere in the region, is fundamentally inconsistent with achieving victory in Iraq;
  • the House of Representatives has unshakable confidence that, with the support of the American people and the Congress, United States Armed Forces, along with Iraqi and Coalition forces, shall achieve victory in Iraq

In the first case, many representatives have already expressed opinions to the contrary and so couldn’t vote yea on this resolution in good conscience. In the second, it seems clear that many representatives think we’ve botched this thing and that there’s not “unshakable” confidence that we’ll win. It’s a stupid resolution whose aim is to make those voting against it look bad by putting them in a corner so that they feel as if they have to vote for it or look like they’re not in favor of victory because that’s the controversial point everybody’ll zoom in on.

Highlighting the one point without even acknowledging that there are others that might complicate things strikes me as being pretty dishonest. I’m sure there are many conservative pundits and propagandists who’re doing just this sort of thing. Sadly, liberals do it too.

The moral, of course, is that headlines and blurbs don’t tell the whole story, and you can’t usually trust either the left-wing or the right-wing source from which you got a given controversial snippet.